An email
February 7, 2011 Leave a comment
Terri (miss you!) sent me an email with a quote from Plato, in which he stated that no human matter was of any importance. This was my response (in the post-script of an email, while I was bored at work toward the end of my co-op). I think it came out in the form of a blog post, and I was just thinking about it, so here it shall lie until the end of CERN.
PS, welcome to the Arena of Nothinglefttodo, with your host, David Bensley! We are now presenting: The Longest Post-Script of All Time! Enjoy the show!
![]()
To take what he said in the literal sense, I disagree with Plato. If nothing human is of any importance, then what is important? Perhaps you think humans are no more important than other animals; I would agree. But it’s a perverse sort of melodramatic anthropocentrism to say that animal suffering/happiness is more important than human suffering/happiness, so I’ll consider them to be one in the same here.
In that way, he is implying that no matter of living beings is important. It’s hard to say that anything is important, then, because the Earth’s natural events’ only inherent significance is born of their effects on the creatures that inhabit it. Would you consider it “important” if a giant meteor pummeled the earth, causing a global temperature rise followed by an ice age, if there were no living beings affected by it? Would it be “important” if a giant tsunami swelled up and decimated nothing? I’d hardly say it would.
The meteor was important because it wiped out the dinosaurs (most of them, anyway, including all of the large ones), permanently reduced the amount of oxygen in the air, and completely changed the flora and fauna of the earth. The tsunami of 2004 was important because of the pain and suffering it caused for hundreds of thousands of people in Asia and the rest of the world, as well as the animals that lived in the affected areas. These are natural events, not exclusively human matters, but their significance is born of the effects on those whom Plato calls insignificant.
Importance is relative; I don’t think there’s a question about that. Certainly, winning the Stanley Cup is not a matter of utmost importance (just ask Alex Ovechkin). But detonating nuclear bombs in two cities was important. Discovering antibiotics and vaccines was important. The SPCA and Red Cross are important. They have the property of affecting living, feeling organisms the world over–what’s more important than that?
To a theist, I imagine it’s elevated to a whole new level. If God created man in his own image and we are His favored creatures, how could even our most important events be unimportant? If a human action on Earth will affect a soul (or many souls) for all eternity, how is it not important?
What do you think?
(dated Dec. 13, 2010)